Shaw retracts open-source claim on pumpfun-source code
Developer Shaw said code he posted on GitHub as open source did not belong to him and that he had no right to license it.
What we know
Shaw said the code at lalalune/pumpfun-source was never his to release, license or authorise others to use, and that the "Copyright (c) 2026 Shaw" license was invalid.
What people are posting
Posts on X this story draws on. They are individual users' views and have not been verified by Global Eye 24.
@MidCurveMortal
“I previously said that code I posted on GitHub at lalalune/pumpfun-source was open source. It wasn't.”
View post →By the Global Eye 24 desk, with AI assistance. Updated as the story develops. Spot an error? Write to corrections@globaleye24.com.