Ethereum and Solana narratives: ETH as store of value, Solana trade share
Vitalik argues ETH should focus on being a store of value rather than a fee-burning token, while Solana's Fidelity-cited trade share is touted and Glamsterdam gas costs worry developers.
What we know
@toly backs Vitalik's point that fees aren't a product. @toly amplifies the claim that Solana handled ~15% of exchange trades per Fidelity Digital Assets. An account on X RTs a dev warning about 49M code-deposit gas under Glamsterdam. Another account on X also reports Vitalik's comments on AI compute.
How the story developed
Vitalik argues ETH should focus on being a store of value rather than a fee-burning token, while Solana's Fidelity-cited trade share is touted and Glamsterdam gas costs worry developers.
Devs are told to verify contracts after Glamsterdam, while Solana degens debate celebrity-token failures and bear-market-surviving memes.
Sources
“you can't focus on fees as the product”
View post →“Let's double it”
View post →By the Global Eye 24 desk, with AI assistance. Updated as the story develops. Spot an error? Write to corrections@globaleye24.com.